Entries from January 2008
January 20, 2008 · 1 Comment
I have long contended that artists and comedians had extraordinary powers of observations. My sister is a talented artist and she notices the smallest details, which of course lead to her unbelievably realistic artwork. She notices how many petals are on a flower, what direction lies the fur on a dog’s back lies, or the hills just in the distance. Those details easily lost on the more casual observer.
Some of my favorite comedians seem to have a similar knack. In fact, Jerry Seinfeld made a whole TV series by observing the obsurdities of every day life.
In Denis Hauptly’s Something Really New, he outlines three simple steps to creating truly innovative products, which pretty much center around thoughtful observation. What tasks do people try to accomplish? How can an innovative product, service, or combination of things streamline and remove steps from the task? He points to lots of great examples, but all center around letting rich observation and behavioral research (like the ethnography studies that I have seen done at many companies) lead to new categories of product. Only by observing a busy mother managing her day and using products, can you really empathize with her and design new products to make her life easier.

In planning for Remarkable, we are actively taking this approach. How many steps are involved in the task as currently implemented? Ask a lot of questions. How can the creative application of technology make the task easier and faster by eliminating steps? The final product will benefit from lots of observation (not to mention the fact that I am designing this product for myself, really see the need for it, and can’t wait to use it). Actively and thoughtfully streamlining the workflow will help the product stay simple and relevant.
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: artists, innovation, marketing, moms, observation, product development, Simplicity, target market, workflow
January 20, 2008 · 1 Comment
Having managed teams and recruited employees, one thing has been reinforced time and time again: People pick employers and make career decisions based on criteria generally unknown to employers. The bigger the decisions, the more the criteria is unknown. Offer an employee a relocation to a different part of the country, and then you will find out about the ailing health of their mother-in-law, their complicated custody agreements, or their involvement in a local soccer league. In other words, there are reasons people work that have nothing to do with work.
Over the holidays, I read Ricardo Semler’s book The Seven-Day Weekend. He have some very provocative ideas about a variety of business topics, but I really was interested in some of his ideas about human resources policies. He emphasized the importance of personal choice. He suggests what the employees’ neighbors and family get paid it more important than extensive job classification studies that HR professionals might rely on to set pay levels. The diversity of individual preferences play out even more dramatically in other benefits areas, like health care, tuition reimbursement, variable pay/bonus programs.
Makes me think what loyalty and motivation a company would inspire, if they offered compensation and benefits options. One employee might choose to get every Friday off, in exchange for other perks. Another employee needs more robust insurance, another wants to enroll in an MBA program and another wants a childcare credit. One wants to invest their annual performance raise in a bonus program based on next year’s success. Another wants a scholarship for their college-age child. The options can be endless.
I remember an entrepreneur I know mentioning how her company offered on-site day care when her children were young and it became a big benefit to others that she employed at the time. In other times in her business, those resources were put into other things that were more important to her employees at that time in her life.
If an employer found a way to offer a really flexible, menu-style total compensation program that allowed employees to cater their package each year to the needs of their families and lifestyles, imagine the loyalty that would be engendered. After all, there isn’t another company that would give them the same package and an apples-to-apples comparison would be impossible. Not to mention, the well-documented benefits of having happy, satisfied employees and its impact on customer service, productivity, and recruiting efforts in the community.
Creative Outlet Labs is probably a long ways from having a huge staff of regular employees, but when we do, I will think long and hard about offering non-traditional, highly-flexible compensation and benefits because a “one size fits you” approach (instead of a “one size fits all” approach) might be just the thing that gets a key employee through our door.
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: benefits, choice, compensation, employees, employment, human resources
I have been involved in many enterprise software or platform selection processes in my career and I can tell you that the discussions closely resemble religious debates. At the risk of sounding disrespectful or irreverent, I have found that evangelicals on both sides of these software debates can find it difficult to see common ground and greater purpose. I have joked that asking people to commit to a common CRM (customer relationship management) platform or the like is akin to forcing people to become Methodist when they were raised Lutheran (or insert any two religions here). In the end, they must not just be software users. They must be converts.
While true that people like expressing their own opinions and control over their working environment, that isn’t all that is at play here. It goes deeper. It is all about the users. Getting people to agree on a software platform, is actually getting people to agree to a style of work, a tone of communication, and perhaps even a business strategy. It is personal.
In consumer web applications, like we are building at Creative Outlet Labs, the choices of tools and process are even more personal. We have to allow for a variation of user styles and outcomes, while staying true to the core value we are providing. In short, we have to focus on the user first. As the cartoonist and muse, Hugh MacLeod, says below “It’s not what the software does. It’s what the user does.”
On the topic of platform selection, I ran across an interesting overview published by Smashing Magazine about some of the different software frameworks out there for web applications and why people feel so strongly for and against. I found it readable, even for a non-technical person.
Categories: Uncategorized
“Listen, here’s what I think. I think we can’t go around measuring our goodness by what we don’t do. By what we deny ourselves. What we resist, and who we exclude. I think we’ve got to measure goodness by what we embrace, what we create, and who we include.” – From the movie Chocolat and brought to my attention from Management Craft
May you embrace, create, and include this year!
If you are looking for ways to do these three things, be sure to sign up for the beta of Remarkable by Creative Outlet Labs.
This fantastic (and somewhat unbelievable) photo by Allan White.
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: Create, Embrace, Include, Invite, New Year, Resolutions